Showing posts with label pen faulkner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pen faulkner. Show all posts

Sunday, September 7, 2014

Weighing in on the Man Booker Prize Longlist 2014

I'm back with another attempt to weigh in on one of the major literary prizes - the Man Booker Prize.

The longlist was announced 23 July 2014, and the shortlist will be announced Tuesday, 9 September 2014. Maybe I'm strange, but I like to decide for myself without the sway of an award that has already been given.  The time frame is pretty short and some of these books are not yet out in the USA, so I only was able to read half of the longlist.

That said, let's examine the list.  The books I have not yet read because of their forthcoming status or because of some other delay (some of these I'm the next in line at the library) include:

how to be both by Ali Smith (published just this past Thursday. I didn't get to it.)
J by Howard Jacobson (okay, this was published in August, I wonder how I missed that!)
The Dog by Joseph O'Neill (will be published 9 September)
The Lives of Others by Neel Mukherjee (published in June)
The Narrow Road to the Deep North by Richard Flanagan (published last September)
Us by David Nicholls (will not come out until the end of September)
To Rise Again At A Decent Hour by Joshua Ferris (out and on hold at the library)

I want to spend my time discussing the books I have read.

The Wake by Paul Kingsnorth
I was intrigued by the idea of this novel, but I didn't last long in trying to read it.  The author, in his first novel, decided to write a faux Middle English to tell the story of the Norman Invasion and its aftermath.  My poor head just couldn't do it.  I tried consulting the author's very scarce glossary of terms after realizing that the words weren't just phonyms (if that's the word) but sometimes completely different in meaning.  But not all words are included in the glossary.  I tried reading it out loud to get into the rhythm of it, but felt I was missing too much of it.  And then the headaches started.  I'm not really a fan of gimmicks in my books.  Perhaps they could create a separate award for linguistic experiments?

Here is a sample from the first page:


We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves by Karen Joy Fowler
This was the only book from the list that I had already read by the time the longlist was announced.  It was a finalist for the Nebula Award this year, which is what originally prompted me to read it.  The Nebula Award included more than one book considered to be crossover into literary fiction, or primarily literary, the other being The Golem and the Jinni.  The award went to a space opera novel, but I was as happy to see it on the Nebula list as I was to see it on the Booker.  Fowler has had a busy year, also winning the PEN/Faulkner Award in April for this novel.  Another interesting observation - this is one of two novels on the longlist to include science and Bloomington, Indiana. That must be what happens when you include American authors! You will notice I'm not talking much about this book, and you shouldn't read reviews of it before you read it.  A review, even a summary, would give you enough information to ruin the reading experience.

History of the Rain by Niall Williams
I had not heard of this author prior to seeing the list, although I have noticed they often include Irish authors in the nominations.  This was a novel I expected to like far more than I did, in fact I took a significant break after the first 100 pages to read other things.  It is about a daughter getting to know her father through his library, but there were Too Many Things Capitalized For Importance.  Somehow it was the style that I didn't like.  I usually love books about books.  Still puzzling over why I didn't care more.

Orfeo by Richard Powers
If you're keeping score, this is the other novel with science as a theme, as well as a partial setting in Bloomington, Indiana.  This is also a novel about music composition, music theory, and leaving a legacy.  It is told in alternating chunks from the present and looking back.  I had never read anything by Powers and I was hooked on his style.  I've heard him criticized as the "best worst writer" or something like that but I'm willing for that criticism to reflect on me as a reader because I loved it. I stayed up late into the night to finish it.  There was so much connecting the story to my own life that it was even a bit eerie.

The Blazing World by Siri Hustvedt
This is a complex novel about a female artist who put out her work through men, told through posthumous journals, interviews with family, friends, and frenemies, and scholarly works.  I admired the complexity and enjoyed trying to piece out what could be believed and what had actually happened, while hating the main character.  There is a bit of coldness to this one, and while it didn't stop me from getting wrapped up in the story, I didn't personally connect with it the way I did with some of the others.

The Bone Clocks by David Mitchell
One of the highlights of my reading life this year was getting to meet David Mitchell at a reading/signing he did in the spring. (I really should blog about that one of these days.) He is one of the few authors I buy books from, sight unseen, the day they are out, and I'm happy to see him back on the longlist.  Here's to hoping this book makes the cut to the shortlist!  This book came out on Tuesday and I am not finished with it yet. I was worried I'd read it too quickly.  It is wonderful, and reminds me of Murakami in the way he is winding little threads of fantasy into the novel.  He does like his threads, much like Cloud Atlas, there are certain things that continue throughout.  There are also little easter eggs for those of us who have read and remembered his other novels, but I'll leave you to discover those for yourself.

I do not envy the Booker judges this year.  And they seem to have a different focus depending on the group. I remember one year where they decided they needed an adventure novel, that was a strange departure.  Last year went more the direction I expect from the Booker - a long, complicated, historical novel (Eleanor Catton's The Luminaries).

I'm hoping this year is the year of the complex novel. I'd include Mitchell, Hustvedt, and Powers for sure. I'd leave out Kingsnorth and Williams. I'm not sure what they will think of Fowler! They also have the full slate of the longlist to choose from, and I am looking forward to seeing that list.  I imagine I will still make the attempt to at least read the short list before the award is announced mid-October. 

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Reading Envy's Pick for the PEN/Faulkner Award

I finished the last book on nominee list for the The PEN/Faulkner Award for Fiction tonight, just in time for the award to be announced March 26!

The description again from their website:
Founded by writers in 1980, the PEN/Faulkner Foundation brings together American writers and readers in a wide variety of programs to promote a love of literature.  The foundation is named for William Faulkner, who used his Nobel Prize funds to create an award for young writers, and PEN, the international writers’ organization.


If I had to bet, I'd say that this year's award will go to a volume of short stories. I think I'd give a slight edge to the Millhauser over the DeLillo, but they are such different volumes it is hard to say.   DeLillo reads as a capture of a certain time, and is a short set of more recent stories.  The Millhauser is really a compilation of thirty years of stories, with only the first handful being brand new (they were my favorites in the volume too). 

Millhauser was a pleasant surprise. He writes with an imagined nostalgia, for things that never really existed, like magic carpets and intricately carved snow people. Some of the stories are more about the magic found in the mundane, like the time between when you get to the ocean and you first stick a toe in, and these were my favorite. The least interesting (to me) were those about people who DO magic, like magicians and wizards, and I ended up skimming those.

One of my favorite Millhauser stories was "We Others," told from the perspective of a ghost (oh, it took me two reviews of this book to realize that is also the title the author chose for it.  Well he should!). It starts like this:
"We others are not like you. We are more prickly, more jittery, more restless, more reckless, more secretive, more desperate, more cowardly, more bold. We live at the edges of ourselves, not in the middle places. We leave that to you. Did I say: more watchful? That above all. We watch you, we follow you, we spy on you, we obsess over you. We crave your attention. We hunger for a sign...."
If I were awarding the PEN/Faulkner, this is how it would go:
  1. Steven Millhauser for We Others: New and Selected Stories (my review)
  2. Don DeLillo for The Angel Esmeralda: Nine Stories (my review)
  3. Russell Banks for Lost Memory of Skin (my review)
  4. Anita Desai for The Artist of Disappearance (my review)
  5. Julie Otsuka for The Buddha in the Attic (my review)
I know the Otsuka is listed on a bunch of award nominations this year.  I feel like I have very good reasons for having less of an opinion about it, and I encourage you to read my review.  I always feel a little strange when I disagree with the majority, but I have my own mind, thank you very much.  

Have you read any of these?  Do you have any thoughts to share before the 26th?

Thursday, March 8, 2012

New Reading Lists to Envy

It has been a while since I've posted about books I'm envying!

There are so many award lists out there right now - finalists, long lists, nominees - I haven't caught up.  I may never catch up.  But I can try!

I currently have my eye on:

The PEN/Faulkner Award for Fiction - awarded March 26, 2012
Founded by writers in 1980, the PEN/Faulkner Foundation brings together American writers and readers in a wide variety of programs to promote a love of literature.  The foundation is named for William Faulkner, who used his Nobel Prize funds to create an award for young writers, and PEN, the international writers’ organization.


2012 Nominees, which I'm almost done with:
  • Russell Banks for Lost Memory of Skin (my review here)
  • Don DeLillo for The Angel Esmeralda: Nine Stories (my review in GoodReads)
  • Anita Desai for The Artist of Disappearance (currently reading)
  • Steven Millhauser for We Others: New and Selected Stories (on its way to me)
  • Julie Otsuka for The Buddha in the Attic (my review here)

I've enjoyed the nominees for PEN/Faulkner, although I didn't re-read the Otsuka, which was also on the National Book Award list earlier this year.  Once I finish the last two, I'll write a post about all five.

Nebula Awards - awarded May 20, 2012 Science fiction and fantasy awards in a wide number of categories.

  • Among Others by Jo Walton
  • Embassytown by China MiĆ©ville
  • Firebird by Jack McDevitt
  • God’s War by Kameron Hurley
  • Mechanique by Genevieve Valentine
  • The Kingdom of Gods by N.K. Jemisin (read my review in GoodReads)
I always try to read all the nominees in short story, novelette, novella, and novel for the Nebula Awards.  This year I'll be listening to the short stories in audio, with the hopes of doing a podcast devoted to them on SFF Audio.

Check out the listing of links to free MP3s of all the short stories that my friend Tamahome put together!

Orange Prize Long List - shortlist April 17, awarded May 30
Officially this isn't announced until tomorrow, but it is already tomorrow in the UK, and since I was involved with the Orange Prize Project in January, I've kept my finger more on the pulse of this award.  Despite the controversy surrounding the award (is it disparaging to have an award just for women? etc.), I usually find the nominees are very good, unlike some of the other categories where I have a few I just can't understand.  Of course, this long list includes Lord of Misrule, which I really disliked when it was the winner of the National Book Award in 2010.  The award seems to go back rather far in time, if it is including books from 2010, but I might not understand the parameters.

I'm not sure if I'll read all of the long list, at least not in time for the shortlist announcement (a little over a month from now, and I'm sure some titles aren't available in the states).  But I've read a few already!

Let's take a look:
  • Island of Wings by Karin Altenberg
  • On the Floor by Aifric Campbell 
  • The Grief of Others by Leah Hager Cohen 
  • The Sealed Letter by Emma Donoghue 
  • Half Blood Blues by Esi Edugyan (hmm, this is at least its third nomination, guess I can finally read it)
  • The Forgotten Waltz by Anne Enright 
  • The Flying Man by Roopa Farooki 
  • Lord of Misrule by Jaimy Gordon (my crotchety review here)
  • Painter of Silence by Georgina Harding
  • Gillespie and I by Jane Harris
  • The Translation of the Bones by Francesca Kay
  • The Blue Book by A.L. Kenned
  • The Night Circus by Erin Morgenstern (my review on SFF Audio)
  • The Song of Achilles by Madeline Miller 
  • Foreign Bodies by Cynthia Ozick
  • State of Wonder by Ann Patchett
  • There but for the by Ali Smith (my review)
  • The Pink Hotel by Anna Stothard
  • Tides of War by Stella Tillyard
  • The Submission by Amy Waldman (not read yet, but definitely in the top 10 of 2011 according to my list crunching)

Saturday, March 3, 2012

Lost Memory of Skin by Russell Banks

Lost Memory of SkinLost Memory of Skin by Russell Banks
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

This is the first book I've read by Banks, although I've heard some of his others are better. I decided to go ahead and read this first since it was nominated for the PEN/Faulkner Award in 2012.

This is the story of "Kid," who is a 21 year old military reject, virgin, and convicted sex offender who ends up living in a community of sex offenders under a causeway in southern Florida because of all the restrictions of where convicted sex offenders can live. He is befriended by a sociology professor who studies the homeless.

Kid has issues because of his upbringing, including a severe porn addiction, and seems to only deal well with animals (he has a huge iguana named Izzy at the beginning). The professor's story is revealed throughout the novel.

There isn't anything in here that I can pinpoint as being great, although I was engaged in the story the whole time. Karen Russell definitely writes this landscape better than Banks (although to be fair, his focus was on the characters), and the twists at the end seemed too little too late to really be fleshed out. I ended up wanting more of the Professor, although I don't think I could stand any more discussions on his eating habits.